Ubisoft won't rush Assassin's Creed 2 to market

i dont think any game should be rushed onto the market if you ask me.

• 

  LeeMc wrote at 10:23 on 25 June 2008

  I didnt think the original was that great because of the very long cutscenes that you cant skip. Hopefullly that will be fixed and maybe a longer story with more re-play value

• 

  random935-2-5 wrote at 02:15 on 02 July 2008

  quality titles that last and don't get boring. I really looking forward to Prince of Persia, though.

• 

  Tugs wrote at 08:59 on 07 July 2008

  Higher quality. I'll wait an extra three years, so long as it's WORTH it.

• 

  Jayson wrote at 10:08 on 14 July 2008

  I reckon wait. But not 3 years. Thats a bit long, people would get bored of waiting and not even bother. But someting like 1 and a half years or 2 is a good time to wait. Especially if you are going to make a third Assassins Creed.
  
  Make the game longer, and have either shorter cutscenes or make them interesting.

• 

  Osama wrote at 12:00 on 27 August 2008

  No longer than 2 yeas, Why?,
  look at Gears of war 2: Major improvement high quality graphics better than the first one, and brand new gameplay with just 2 years .

• 

  xboxlive wrote at 12:18 on 27 August 2008

  i dont think any game should be rushed onto the market if you ask me.

• 

  dave wrote at 22:06 on 30 August 2008

  if there is to be a third assassin's creed why wait so long for the second? if the third takes 3 years to make then that's a total of 6 years, by then all interest will be lost because you have managed to out live the target audience. ok i want a decent quality but if you can't give it on a decent time-scale maybe rethink making sequels to games.

Name:      Register Free (Why?)

Write your comment in English here.

Verify:   Type these characters into the text box (you can register to skip this step in the future):