[ « Previous Page | 1 | 2 ]
Haze's campaign is pretty unspectacular, lacking in spectacular moments and set-pieces that other modern shooters have in spades. Problems caused by dumb AI squad mates, instant kills from unseen rockets and unimpressive vehicle controls don't help matters - trying to manoeuvre a buggy along a narrow road with instant death on either side isn't fun. As original and unique as the Nectar administrating gameplay sounded, by the end of the short six-hour campaign (less if you're at all experienced with the genre) you'll be glad it's all over. In fact the last level gives the appearance of being cut to pieces, with a high-speed vehicle section losing any sense of excitement because of constant fades to black to skip to slightly later moments in time.
The core gameplay behind Haze isn't bad at all. Gun-play is solid, with the zoomed in view allowing anyone with some experience and enough accuracy to take down enemies with relative ease. Weapons feel powerful too, able to down enemies without the need to unload tons of lead. None of this matters though when you're up against enemies that don't seem to care about self preservation (the fact that they're high on Nectar is no excuse). Level design isn't great either, like the terrible missile carrier escort mission which requires you to guard the slowest moving vehicle known to man as it moves across a bridge. I dislike escort missions at the best of times, but this particular level tested my patience to near breaking point.
By far the biggest criticism I can level at Haze is how dated it feels. Nothing about the single-player campaign feels fresh once you're through the opening few levels, with environments, gameplay and combat feeling like the games we were playing on the original Xbox and PlayStation 2. This doesn't make Haze a bad game, but just nothing we haven't played over and over again in the past few years. The storyline is one of its defining features, but some cheesy acting and a dodgy script often lessen the serious impact it could have had.
Haze's potential saviour is its multiplayer functionality. The 16-player online competitive play is solid and works well online, offering plenty of game modes and an in-game friends list. You've got your standard deathmatch and team deathmatch as well as an object-based game mode that should offer some decent matches once the servers are full. It's hard to see Haze's online component drawing too many players over from CoD4, but decent sales should see it gain a strong user base.
Perhaps an even bigger selling point is the four-player drop in and out co-op online or LAN - two players are supported via split-screen. Played with real people taking the place of AI team mates the game is better, there's no question about it. You no longer have to contend with allies running directly into your line of fire and it no longer takes two to three guys to take down a single enemy. It does make the game incredibly easy though, making it possible to run through the levels in double quick time. Had this co-op been slotted into an all-round more exciting campaign we'd be singing its praises no end, but sadly here it just makes a disappointing game a little bit more entertaining.
Much has been made of Haze's exclusivity to the PlayStation 3, with many believing this would allow for some of the best visuals seen on the console. Although Free Radical's game isn't ugly, it has the look of a PC game from a few years ago, and pales in comparison to the likes of Halo 3, Gears of War and Resistance. For the most part it runs at a smooth frame rate, only bogging down during intense fire-fights, but it still disappoints considering its status as a high-profile PS3 exclusive. Little blemishes like AI soldiers repeatedly walking into walls or into fire don't help, and on numerous occasions my checkpoint save would re-load with my character stuck in some scenery - nothing that couldn't be overcome, but sloppy nonetheless.
Haze is far from a complete disaster but, given the high level of hype surrounding its release and the pedigree of developer Free Radical, it still stands as one of the biggest disappointments of this generation. Good ideas are there, but it all descends into a bog standard FPS before too long. Playing with friends is definitely the way to go if you can, avoiding the dodgy AI team mates as much as possible, but this can't make up for a lacklustre campaign and underwhelming presentation. While certainly better than Turok and other severe disappointments the FPS genre has seen in recent months, Haze is nowhere near the classic slice of entertainment we originally expected.
[ « Previous Page | 1 | 2 ]






[ 1 | 2 | Next Page » ]
Oops wrote at 12:22 on 21 May 2008
Glad you bothered with the 'Launch Centre', eh?
Hmm? wrote at 13:12 on 21 May 2008
Tom Orry = MS Fanboy
OMG wrote at 14:44 on 21 May 2008
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
what a loser. Just admit when a game is rubbish. Looks like your the Sony fanboy that cant take it when a BIG exclusive turns out rubbish. It happens. Just because a game is exclusive doesnt mean it will be a good game.
Seriously wrote at 16:08 on 21 May 2008
No doubt. The '360 has an abundance of 'exclusives' that are crippled crap.
The reviews for this game have not been good. PSN Italy, Import Tuner(who gives a sh*t about them anyway) and Famitsu have been the only 'favorable' reviews that I've seen. I'm not saying more don't exist, it's just that I've not seen them.
HAHA wrote at 18:35 on 21 May 2008
I wonder how long it will take for the accusation that reviewers are on the take from MS. Talk about denial... Yeah, you're right, all bad reviews are due to bribes by Microsoft. But with that logic, MGS4 getting good reviews means bribes from Sony right?..... Right?
Another lame PS3 exclusive, LOL.... joins the ranks of Lair and Heavenly Sword. XBOX 360 ftw.
nice job wrote at 23:53 on 21 May 2008
shut up u dumb xbot. you have gotten 360 sucking out all your brain juice and losing all your humanity becoming a bot of M$. you obviously didnt play Heavenly Sword from start to the end. i can tell you its one of the most epic game that has been out so far. the only drawback about it is it would be great if the story is longer than it is atm. none of the 360 game give the same feeling of what Heavenly Sword can deliver. just fyi i owned both console. i like both of them in their own ways. but using 360 bashing on ps3 is just dumb. as an owner of both console i do not deny ps3 is indeed a slightly more powerful machine than 360 in certain ways thou 360 still has its own advantage in certain area.
Anonymous wrote at 04:05 on 22 May 2008
Erh... Halo Killer? Anyone? Remember me Lair, Heavenly Sword etc.
Anonymous wrote at 04:08 on 22 May 2008
PS3 exclusive + extra development time = shit
Anonymous wrote at 04:10 on 22 May 2008
"PS3 exclusive + extra development time = shit"
PS3 exclusive + extra development time = disappointment
Anonymous wrote at 05:20 on 22 May 2008
What the hell were they thinking over there at free radical? hey I thought heavenly sword was a good game but everyone knows what will own all GOW3,Killzone,MGS4,RS2,eight days ect.... dont give up on the ps3 just yet
Frodo Baggins wrote at 08:19 on 22 May 2008
Could be worse you could have already pre ordered or bought this game. I suppose if you did it could be worse again. You could have Aids! I'm off to chase the ring of Solid Snake now. Thats one ring i'm intrested in mmm Pooey Delight!
Karlius wrote at 08:21 on 22 May 2008
LMAO at Frodo Baggins its a shame this game is crap i expected it to be ok! But it will sell quite well due to the over hype! Its the first big hype game since GTA and it clearly sucks i mean i watched the videogamer show it looks good concept poor implementation. I wasn't a fan of time splitters eiher!
IGN Gave the game 4.5 / 10
and most others vary from 5 to 7 depending on how much advertisement they gave the game it seems. But i guess all these games magazine sites are all MS fanboys o huh? What a loser!
Karlius? wrote at 22:16 on 22 May 2008
Arent you a MS fanboy anyway. Have you played....errrm no. i havent either so shut ur ass and wait. FFS this hasnt had a chance apart from gettin raped by u monkeys bleeding from your dicks.
IGN MS fans anyway.
Sazse wrote at 22:21 on 22 May 2008
Yeah, I hope they wont ****ing ruin GOW3, KZ2, MGS4, RS2, 8Days also. We've been waiting too much for nice PS3 exclusives so far. I could remember only 3 wich made the leap over mediocrity: Uncharted, Ratchet and Motorstorm. Resistance was OK, but regular.
Karlius wrote at 22:31 on 22 May 2008
Got to be honest been watching some gameplay of MGS4 it looks awesome but the version i saw had little holes in it but think that will be cleaned up for release! I d also say GOW2 will be good! For me Resistance was a poor mans Gears of War and the second will be a poor mans Gears 2 thats a no brainer. I'm iffy bout 8 days could go either way.
IGN MS Fanboys what an idiot i laugh at these blatant idiotic fan boys. Face it the game looks utter ****! Sazse i'm glad to hear from such a reasonable PS3 owner Dude you rock and have brightned my day as i did not believe there was such a race!
cheese wrote at 15:33 on 23 May 2008
still think it will be an okay game im sure it will be great online xbox fanboys are just jealous
Kiroquai wrote at 16:36 on 23 May 2008
It's... okay online. Nothing too special, but still good fun. Call of Duty 4's multiplayer is better, mind, That said, I completely agree with the review when it comes to the single player being a bit todge; it really isn't very good at all.
To avoid being called a Microsoft fanboy, I:
a) Work in the industry and can't be bothered what platform my games are for
and
b) Earn enough to own all three so don't have to justify my purchases by talking ********.
Devin wrote at 01:51 on 24 May 2008
People who gives a crap about what system is better, in my opinion they are both decent in their own ways. own both xbox and ps3. to me this game looks like shit and i tend towards ps3 games. Halo in my opinion is shitty, i would have to say the killzone franchise is better but i havent played the new one. the ps3 does have more graphics power hands down, COD4 looks way better on ps3 than 360 and GTA4 looks better too. and i do play on HD. people argue live is better than psn but id say they are pretty close to the same. you also have to consider the ps3 is a much harder console to develope games on where as the 360 is very similar to the pc's development. Give it a break with 360 is better all ps3 exclusives suck. ps3 has been on the market less time than the 360 and does have some decent titles comming out in the near future. You also have to remember that the ps market has not always been shooters it is more of the rpg fantasy, sports family console where as the xbox 1 was a hard core m rated system with all the fps and hardcore games made for the teens and young adults (military guys) both systems have their goods and bads hardware wise ps3 better, gameplay xbox better . I prefer ps3 myself. this is just an opinion. psn Fuoman Xbox live Devin003
[ 1 | 2 | Next Page » ]