[ 1 | 2 | Next Page » ]
Some games rise to the occasion, managing to ride the wave of hype into gaming history, but others crumble. Haze, from TimeSplitters developer Free Radical, feels like a game crushed under the weight of expectation, a game that appears to have been frozen in time from four years ago. As solid as certain parts of the game are, no amount of nectar coursing through your veins will disguise the ugly truth that Haze is one of the most disappointing releases of the year.
Haze begins with you, Shane Carpenter, fighting as part of the Mantel Global Industries' army, an army tanked up on a yellow liquid known as Nectar. This is administered to every soldier while out in the battlefield and paints a very different view of war compared to reality. While high on the yellow stuff you can't see dead bodies, the world is brighter, enemies stick out as if they're on fire and threats are seen before they happen. Essentially Nectar turns normal soldiers into super soldiers, able to take on pretty much whatever stands in their way.
Your Nectar high is lost fairly quickly though. Although you can tap L2 to administer another dose (assuming you haven't used your supply) it's far better to keep the high going by taking down enemies. Each successful kill replenishes your meter slightly, allowing you to remain a super soldier for as long as there are enemies to kill.
Things aren't quite as clear cut as they sound. As with all drugs, an overdose isn't recommended. Take too much and your vision will blur and your view of the world will change for the worst. Worst still, you'll start shooting uncontrollably. While you can just about control this, when it happens to a team-mate you better find a safe place very quickly. The inconsistent AI soldiers have a habit of running in the line of fire, so you'll frequently hit their Nectar dispensers causing an OD - very annoying.
It's fair to say that the opening few levels of Haze are interesting, if not spectacular. The Nectar system makes for a game that feels different to the rest of first-person shooters on offer, and the banter between characters gives a good insight into the lives of soldiers and the politics going on. Sadly the game changes rather drastically quite early on, with you seeing the truth behind the Nectar. Seeing the error of your ways you switch sides, opting to help out the rebels of the Promise Hand in their fight against Mantel.
From here on you don't have access to the ability enhancing Nectar, meaning what plays out is simply a rather generic, bland FPS. Instead of using Nectar to enhance your own abilities you use it against the Mantel soldiers. Lob a Nectar grenade into a group of soldiers and they'll OD on the gas. Losing all control, they'll turn on their own team mates, leaving you to mop up the remaining soldiers. The same goes for a knife dipped in the yellow liquid, which is deadly in the right hands. Aside from these offensive weapons, as a rebel you can also double tap jump to dodge incoming fire and press L2 to play dead - making you invisible to Mantel soldiers. You don't really need to use the Nectar weapons, as the enemies aren't too smart, but playing dead comes in handy every once in a while and means you'll rarely die on the game's standard difficulty setting.
[ 1 | 2 | Next Page » ]






[ 1 | 2 | Next Page » ]
Oops wrote at 13:22 on 21 May 2008
Glad you bothered with the 'Launch Centre', eh?
Hmm? wrote at 14:12 on 21 May 2008
Tom Orry = MS Fanboy
OMG wrote at 15:44 on 21 May 2008
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
what a loser. Just admit when a game is rubbish. Looks like your the Sony fanboy that cant take it when a BIG exclusive turns out rubbish. It happens. Just because a game is exclusive doesnt mean it will be a good game.
Seriously wrote at 17:08 on 21 May 2008
No doubt. The '360 has an abundance of 'exclusives' that are crippled crap.
The reviews for this game have not been good. PSN Italy, Import Tuner(who gives a sh*t about them anyway) and Famitsu have been the only 'favorable' reviews that I've seen. I'm not saying more don't exist, it's just that I've not seen them.
HAHA wrote at 19:35 on 21 May 2008
I wonder how long it will take for the accusation that reviewers are on the take from MS. Talk about denial... Yeah, you're right, all bad reviews are due to bribes by Microsoft. But with that logic, MGS4 getting good reviews means bribes from Sony right?..... Right?
Another lame PS3 exclusive, LOL.... joins the ranks of Lair and Heavenly Sword. XBOX 360 ftw.
nice job wrote at 00:53 on 22 May 2008
shut up u dumb xbot. you have gotten 360 sucking out all your brain juice and losing all your humanity becoming a bot of M$. you obviously didnt play Heavenly Sword from start to the end. i can tell you its one of the most epic game that has been out so far. the only drawback about it is it would be great if the story is longer than it is atm. none of the 360 game give the same feeling of what Heavenly Sword can deliver. just fyi i owned both console. i like both of them in their own ways. but using 360 bashing on ps3 is just dumb. as an owner of both console i do not deny ps3 is indeed a slightly more powerful machine than 360 in certain ways thou 360 still has its own advantage in certain area.
Anonymous wrote at 05:05 on 22 May 2008
Erh... Halo Killer? Anyone? Remember me Lair, Heavenly Sword etc.
Anonymous wrote at 05:08 on 22 May 2008
PS3 exclusive + extra development time = shit
Anonymous wrote at 05:10 on 22 May 2008
"PS3 exclusive + extra development time = shit"
PS3 exclusive + extra development time = disappointment
Anonymous wrote at 06:20 on 22 May 2008
What the hell were they thinking over there at free radical? hey I thought heavenly sword was a good game but everyone knows what will own all GOW3,Killzone,MGS4,RS2,eight days ect.... dont give up on the ps3 just yet
Frodo Baggins wrote at 09:19 on 22 May 2008
Could be worse you could have already pre ordered or bought this game. I suppose if you did it could be worse again. You could have Aids! I'm off to chase the ring of Solid Snake now. Thats one ring i'm intrested in mmm Pooey Delight!
Karlius wrote at 09:21 on 22 May 2008
LMAO at Frodo Baggins its a shame this game is crap i expected it to be ok! But it will sell quite well due to the over hype! Its the first big hype game since GTA and it clearly sucks i mean i watched the videogamer show it looks good concept poor implementation. I wasn't a fan of time splitters eiher!
IGN Gave the game 4.5 / 10
and most others vary from 5 to 7 depending on how much advertisement they gave the game it seems. But i guess all these games magazine sites are all MS fanboys o huh? What a loser!
Karlius? wrote at 23:16 on 22 May 2008
Arent you a MS fanboy anyway. Have you played....errrm no. i havent either so shut ur ass and wait. FFS this hasnt had a chance apart from gettin raped by u monkeys bleeding from your dicks.
IGN MS fans anyway.
Sazse wrote at 23:21 on 22 May 2008
Yeah, I hope they wont ****ing ruin GOW3, KZ2, MGS4, RS2, 8Days also. We've been waiting too much for nice PS3 exclusives so far. I could remember only 3 wich made the leap over mediocrity: Uncharted, Ratchet and Motorstorm. Resistance was OK, but regular.
Karlius wrote at 23:31 on 22 May 2008
Got to be honest been watching some gameplay of MGS4 it looks awesome but the version i saw had little holes in it but think that will be cleaned up for release! I d also say GOW2 will be good! For me Resistance was a poor mans Gears of War and the second will be a poor mans Gears 2 thats a no brainer. I'm iffy bout 8 days could go either way.
IGN MS Fanboys what an idiot i laugh at these blatant idiotic fan boys. Face it the game looks utter ****! Sazse i'm glad to hear from such a reasonable PS3 owner Dude you rock and have brightned my day as i did not believe there was such a race!
cheese wrote at 16:33 on 23 May 2008
still think it will be an okay game im sure it will be great online xbox fanboys are just jealous
Kiroquai wrote at 17:36 on 23 May 2008
It's... okay online. Nothing too special, but still good fun. Call of Duty 4's multiplayer is better, mind, That said, I completely agree with the review when it comes to the single player being a bit todge; it really isn't very good at all.
To avoid being called a Microsoft fanboy, I:
a) Work in the industry and can't be bothered what platform my games are for
and
b) Earn enough to own all three so don't have to justify my purchases by talking ********.
Devin wrote at 02:51 on 24 May 2008
People who gives a crap about what system is better, in my opinion they are both decent in their own ways. own both xbox and ps3. to me this game looks like shit and i tend towards ps3 games. Halo in my opinion is shitty, i would have to say the killzone franchise is better but i havent played the new one. the ps3 does have more graphics power hands down, COD4 looks way better on ps3 than 360 and GTA4 looks better too. and i do play on HD. people argue live is better than psn but id say they are pretty close to the same. you also have to consider the ps3 is a much harder console to develope games on where as the 360 is very similar to the pc's development. Give it a break with 360 is better all ps3 exclusives suck. ps3 has been on the market less time than the 360 and does have some decent titles comming out in the near future. You also have to remember that the ps market has not always been shooters it is more of the rpg fantasy, sports family console where as the xbox 1 was a hard core m rated system with all the fps and hardcore games made for the teens and young adults (military guys) both systems have their goods and bads hardware wise ps3 better, gameplay xbox better . I prefer ps3 myself. this is just an opinion. psn Fuoman Xbox live Devin003
[ 1 | 2 | Next Page » ]