[ « Previous Page | 1 | 2 ]
First thing you want to do in any given combat scenario is find decent cover. By decent we mean something that's going to stop bullets. Machine gun fire will tear up wood, so fences won't keep you alive for long. A truck, or some barrels will do. From there, you need to go to work on the four Fs. First find. Pressing the back button on the Xbox pad brings up a map of the area, which shows potential cover, enemy positions and, crucially, flanking positions. Before you send your squads off to flank, however, you need to fix (suppress) the enemy. Every enemy has a small red circle hovering above his head. By firing on his position you slowly turn it silver - when done he's suppressed and scared to pop out and shoot at you. That's the perfect time to send your Assault team off to flank and, if all goes well, finish the Germans.
The control system will initially frustrate - we found ourselves zooming in with our rifle when we wanted to crouch and throwing our grenade when we wanted to snap to cover - a new Rainbow Six Vegas 2 style addition to the series. But you soon get the hang of it (and if you don't there are options for pre-set Halo, CoD and RB6 control set ups).
For a series that lives or dies by its AI, it's reassuring to find it impressively smart. There was the odd occasion where it fell down - there were one or two hilarious moments where Germans were stuck running in circles and a quite perplexing bug where a destroyed crate reformed itself in a constantly shifting mess of wood. But, on the whole, if your squad mates get killed it's usually because you've told them to move before suppressing every enemy, and not because they're being frustratingly dumb.
This might sound more like a FAQ than a review to you. But it's worth describing how the combat plays out, since that's what you'll be doing for 99.9 per cent of the game. Indeed one of our problems with Hell's Highway is the repetitiveness of the gameplay. The game is essentially a series of FFFF puzzles, set in various Dutch environments, that need to be solved in order to progress. There is some variation. There are one or two superb solo sections where you're separated from your squad. The abandoned hospital level is a particular, almost Bioshock-esque, highlight. And there's the odd utterly frustrating and completely unrealistic tank mission, where you play a British tank commander and tear up German armour and infantry as if you're Rambo himself, that feels about as removed from the main campaign as a level from Halo 3 would (the fact that the game ends rather limply with one of these missions is a bitter, anti-climactic pill to swallow). But on the whole the combat is so engaging, and rewarding, that you won't get bored.
The game's graphics don't really get going until about half way through the game. Up to that point the Unreal Engine 3 powered lush greens and browns of the Dutch countryside are nice enough to look at, but not spectacular. It's not until the sun goes down and you're fighting under moonlight, and, in one level, moonlight and the pouring rain, that the game excels in the graphics stakes. Again, it's worth pointing out the hospital level here - a wonderfully detailed and atmospheric environment where it's as entrancing to stare at every wall as it is to bear witness to the degradation of Baker's mental health. There's something strangely captivating about a burning car at night, especially when it's saving your life.
Ultimately Hell's Highway won't be for every first-person fan out there. The slower paced gameplay, emphasis on tactics and WWII setting might not appeal to players who only prefer run and gun style shooting, for example. But for those who do like the sound of it, there aren't many WWII shooters out there better than this (Call of Duty II springs to mind). It's a predominantly single-player experience, and, given that Gearbox hasn't uttered one word about the 20-player multiplayer component (something we haven't been able to test before the game's release) suggests it agrees with that particular verdict. We could point to a lack of a co-op function - the idea of having a mate control one of your squads sounds like a lot of fun - a feature many first-person games seem to have these days. But then that's not very Brothers in Arms. This is about Matt Baker, his guilt over the death of the soldiers under his command and his unshakeable courage when everyone else around him despairs. Splitting that story over two characters would dull the effect somewhat.
Bar the jarring Action Camera, there's not a lot wrong with Hell's Highway. Rather, there's a lot good with it. It's an intelligent game made by adults for adults. It'll have a hard time going up against Treyarch's Call of Duty: World at War this Christmas, of course. But, like Sergeant Baker himself, it's going to put up a damn good fight.
[ « Previous Page | 1 | 2 ]






Anonymous wrote at 23:44 on 23 September 2008
Awesome. Cant wait
James wrote at 08:39 on 24 September 2008
Thanks for the review. I totally get your point about the gore/action cam. I'll be turning that off for sure - and can't wait to try Authentic without suppression icons (assuming that's still in the game)
infamousgaming wrote at 13:21 on 24 September 2008
I've read many reviews about this game.. score is from 9 till 7.7 (IGN) .. I'm not sure if this is the game they have promised it would be..
Anonymous wrote at 19:27 on 24 September 2008
Lush Im gonna get it
Ad wrote at 11:12 on 25 September 2008
Focusing on the gore/action cam as a downfall of the game is abit pathetic when it can easily be turned off. The review also complained about the controls being hard to get used to... why not just change it to the cod setting. Apart from that the review is v good.
lastdual wrote at 16:54 on 26 September 2008
I'm liking this a LOT more than COD2. Much more thoughtful action, plus you actually care about the characters.
Cam wrote at 22:09 on 28 September 2008
wtf? the action cam is awesome, and its not like it happens every ten seconds, i thought it was nice addition to the game where you can laugh at how brutal you are, and how wicked of a shot you just made.
Kahm N. Since wrote at 22:38 on 04 October 2008
This is fairly poorly written, but does contain some good information.
Anonymous wrote at 13:51 on 06 October 2008
Seems like a good review, suppose we shall see shall we not? However I am partial to an exploding environment and a little brain use may be a good thing for a change!
uge wrote at 17:08 on 18 October 2008
I bought mine today and it's great.
Better than the old ones. The only bad thing is that there's so little new stuff.
Fleef wrote at 20:36 on 07 November 2008
I loved Earned In Blood and Road To Hill 30 because of the combat style; I hope this new one makes us of the same squad-based tactics. That's what set it apart from other war-based games. It's more strategic than just running around and shooting. My question: is this game worth the $60?
Rasta wrote at 17:20 on 30 December 2008
I don't think this guy played the game that long. The AI is horrible in several places, most notably your squad often runs right into fire when directed to take cover. Enemy AI is also set to obvious triggers. This guy should actually play the game before sending out a BS review!!
tonny white wrote at 12:26 on 01 January 2009
this game is one of the best war games around imo. better than cod 4